We say that is a pandigital product if and the string “abn” obtained by concatenating the base-10 representations of , , and contains all of the digits 1-9 exactly once (with no 0s). In problem 32 we are asked to find the sum of all pandigital products.

I ended up being not particularly fancy about this problem. Loop through enough values for , and, for each , loop through enough values for , and see if you get a pandigital product with , , and . We know that it is enough for to venture up to , but what about bounds on ? If has 5 digits, then to be a pandigital product, with factors and , the factors must be either 1 and 3 digits, or 2 and 2 digits. But 9*999 and 99*99 aren’t 5 digit numbers, so we know we can stop looking for once we get to 10000. Similar reasoning shows that must have more than 3 digits, and so, in fact, to be a pandigital product, must have 4 digits (and since they must not be 0, and must be distinct, 1234 is the smallest possibility).

The following code seems to get the job done:

def ispandigprod(a,b,n):
""" assumes a*b==n """
# consider the digits in the string "abn"
# remove 0s and duplicates (with filter, set)
# if you've still got 9 elements, you're pandigital
return len(set(filter(lambda t:t, map(int, "%s%s%s" % (a,b,n))))) == 9
def solve():
""" return the sum of the pandigital products """
ret = 0
for n in xrange(1234,9876+1):
a = 1
included = False
while(a < n**.5 + 1 and not included):
if(n % a == 0):
b = n//a
if(ispandigprod(a,b,n)):
ret += n
included = True
a += 1
return ret

I’d honestly like a nicer solution for this problem. The loop I have is pretty stupid, and loops through far more choices than is worthwhile. In particular, I’d like to not think about any or that have a digit that is 0. To ignore with a 0 digit, one could replace the “included = False” line (apparently line 10) with

included = str(n).count("0") > 0

This seems to cut the run-time down by about 20% (or more), so is maybe worthwhile. I still expect this code could be improved by a bit, but I think I’ll stop here for now.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

Tags: prob32

This entry was posted on October 30, 2009 at 10:49 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

## Leave a Reply